Showing posts with label Manmohan Singh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manmohan Singh. Show all posts

Saturday, November 14, 2020

Barack Obama on Manmohan Singh

 Barack Obama's memoir 'A Promised Land' promises some confusion also. His observation on Manmohan Singh is as inscrutable as the latter's face.

There is no disputing the fact that the former prime minister of India was poker-faced. He was impassive. He was also considered to be a person of integrity. This of course is not an undisputed fact. He trivialised the unethical conduct of his ministers as the consequence of 'coalition dharma'. He could easily put up with the shenanigans of both his ministers and his leader. At least to that extent, his integrity was diluted and doubtful.

Barack Obama, according to pre-publication reviews of his memoir, says that Manmohan Singh possessed 'impassive integrity'. Does this mean that Singh does not wear his integrity on his sleeves? Integrity cannot be opaque. It is transparent if it exists. If it is hidden or if it is sought to be hidden, it does not exist. Crooks hide dishonesty. Nobody can hide one's honesty. So this interpretation of Obama's enigmatic (impassive?) comment does not lead us anywhere.

Is there a printer's devil? Does Obama simply want to say that Singh is known for his deadpan expressions and also integrity? Maybe yes. It is not only that MMS is inscrutable but any characterisation of him also ends up being incomprehensible. Obama is known for clarity of thinking and ease of expression. Manmohan Singh has confused him!

Monday, December 11, 2017

Indo-Pakistan dinner

Mrs and Mr Mani Shankar Shankar Aiyar hosted a dinner for their friends including Manmohan Singh, Gen.Deepak Kumar, Hamid Ansari, Khurshid Kasuri and the Pakistan High Commissioner. There is nothing wrong or criminal about this.

It is true that one does not expect a former prime minister or a retired army general or a former vice president to hobnob with diplomats of a country with whom we have strained relations. In particular, Manmohan Singh could have exercised better discretion and stayed away.

This ill-planned dinner meeting has made Narendra Modi see red. He is obviously trying to sway the Gujarat voters away from Congress taking advantage of this opportunity gifted to him by  Mani Shankar Aiyar who is a serial malapropist.

The Congress party queered the pitch further by denying the meeting altogether till confirmations of the meeting came from all directions. Manmohan Singh had no hesitation in confirming the dinner-meet though he lashed out at Modi for the latter's innuendo.Singh's explanation is funny:

“I reject the innuendos and falsehoods as I did not discuss Gujarat elections with anyone else at the dinner hosted by Mani Shankar Aiyar as alleged by Modi,” Singh said. “Nor was the Gujarat issue raised by anyone else present at the dinner. The discussion was confined to India-Pakistan relations.”

When he says "I did not discuss Gujarat elections with anyone else", does he mean  that he discussed with some and not anyone else? Or, did he discuss only with himself?

Friday, January 27, 2017

Teflon Manmohan Singh

Manmohan Singh has been doubly fortunate. When he was the finance minister in Narasimha Rao's cabinet, we entered the era of economic reforms which were initiated by the prime minister. The credit however went to Manmohan Singh. Singh never had the courtesy to acknowledge that Narasimha Rao was the trigger. Singh basked and continues to bask in the reflected glory.

From 2004 to 2014 when Singh was the accidental prime minister, many scams took place, most of them criminal. Whenever a crime became public, some ministers or officials were deemed guilty. Singh was always deemed innocent . He would never be investigated. The dictum was: "The king and Singh can do no wrong."

Manmohan Singh's apparent involvement in the Vijay Mallya scam is now the talk of the town. The NDA government which came to power promising good governance and punishment for the guilty does not deem it necessary to investigate the teflon leader. Norms of accountability require that Singh is investigated without any further loss of time for his malignant role in many misdeeds. The reason is simple: 1) If he proves that multiple shenanigans were committed at the behest of somebody else (almost everyone believes Sonia Gandhi was the initiator / beneficiary of several scams), that somebody has to be identified and punished by law, 2) If it is proved that Singh himself was responsible for venality, he has to be put behind bars and 3) if Singh was totally uninvolved in all the scams, he needs to be reprimanded for callous inefficiency.

Whatever be the facts, it is ridiculous that ten years of misrule were tolerated by the nation and law is made to appear helpless. Narendra Modi, despite his assurances of fair play, is setting a bad precedent in letting the former prime minister go uninvestigated and therefore unpunished. We can find out who was responsible for multiple scams only if Singh is investigated thoroughly. However, this is not going to happen. Singh and Modi seem to have a tacit agreement. Modi has to realise that letting a criminal go scot-free is a crime in itself.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Scamnesia

Manmohan Singh has claimed in all humility and in all duplicity that there was no scam and no corruption under his watch. This daredevil mendacity has spawned a neologism: Scamnesia.

A leader is supposed to protect his team's lawful actions and not illegitimate / immoral conduct. Singh facilitated growth of dacoits in his ministry and feels no remorse over his shameful behaviour. He must be brought to justice.

Monday, May 25, 2015

Manmohan Singh's "clean image"

Pradip Baijal, a former Chairman of TRAI,  has made some observations on Manmohan Singh, Dayanidhi Maran and CBI which throw some light on UPA's stand on morality. These are mentioned in Times of India.

"Agency (CBI) forced me to implicate industrialist Ratan Tata and former Cabinet minister Arun Shourie if I wanted to save myself."

" CBI harasses upright civil servants and political opponents of the government in power".

 "They (CBI) would alternately threaten to harm me and my family and then dangle a carrot of sparing me if I implicated Ratan Tata and Arun Shourie,"

"In the 2G case, they (CBI) had told me that there was an open and shut case against me, and an FIR would be filed soon, and I would be arrested. Perhaps the CBI officers were trying to treat their bruised egos at the instance of their old masters. They had warned me in each case that I would be harmed if I did not cooperate."

"This was suspiciously similar to Dayanidhi Maran's threats in 2004. It only dawned on me later that perhaps this was being done either by Dayanidhi Maran and A Raja, acting together or by corporates who were trying to protect their self-interest. Dayanidhi Maran knew exactly what I discussed with the PM. I can only surmise that they were all working in tandem, possibly along with the PM (referring to Manmohan Singh), (P) Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal at different stages, and were guiding the CBI enquiry, getting files removed and, making false statements in the media to make a case against the erstwhile Trai."

" CBI has deteriorated into an instrument of state power, particularly during the terms of the last two directors, A P Singh and Ranjit Sinha."

"In 2004, after a routine meeting, Ratan Tata told me that he was being threatened by Dayanidhi Maran that unless he accepted the merger of Tata Sky with Sun TV, he would ruin him. Ratan Tata refused to cooperate."


"UPA government removed important files from TRAI and telecom ministry to hide its wrongdoings when scandal hit the headlines in 2009-2010."

" Maran told me that he was "Prime Minister, Telecom" and would take all decisions on telecom. "He warned that I would come to severe harm if I did not comply with his instructions. He was proved right, since I did face severe hardships later."

 "...The PM also told me to cooperate with my minister in the coalition government he headed, since non-cooperation could compromise his government". 

 "They (CBI) had warned me in each case (cases related to 2G scam and disinvestments) that I would be harmed if I didn't cooperate. Incidentally, this was exactly what the eminent economist Prime Minister (Manmohan Singh) had told me would happen if I did not cooperate in their scheme of things in the 2G case." 

"Had I agreed to their (Manmohan Singh and Maran) suggestions and not given the report, the 2003 special regime would have continued and UPA would have held NDA or TRAI (including me) responsible for the 2G scam. The PM would not have accepted his responsibility, just as he shirked responsibility in Coalgate scam."

There are many instances where Manmohan Singh compromised with standards of ethical governance. If despite these, there are people who continue to believe in his honesty, it only shows how gullible we are. It is difficult to judge who among Manmohan Singh, Dayanidhi Maran, A.Raja, P.Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal was the worst crook. It is a pity that our criminal justice system has not yet found any of them guilty. One hopes that Modi and his ministers will have a better sense of values.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Manmohan Singh arraigned

The special court hearing the coal case has asked the former prime minister to appear before it. Manmohan Singh admits that he is upset though he is always ready for legal scrutiny. Congress leaders including Sonia Gandhi marched to his house in a show of solidarity.

The learned judge, Bharat Parashar, has needlessly explained, "This court had to act with a heavy conscience and with full realisation what the present order will have over the morale of the country as a whole". The judge has gone out of the way to assure that he has made a detailed analysis before asking for Singh's presence. The former prime minister will doubtless appreciate that all are equal before the law and that it is but inevitable that a person in the thick of scam after scam, conniving or turning a conveniently blind eye, will be made answerable sometime or the other.

Plans are afoot to appeal to the Supreme Court to cancel the summons. It is hoped that the Supreme Court will not bend the law however mighty the arraigned applicant is.

We do not know how history will judge Manmohan Singh. But a scrupulous judiciary has no option but to find him guilty of dereliction of constitutional duty and betrayal of nation's confidence.

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Is Modi = MMS + Execution?

Manmohan Singh was instrumental in formulating the Indo-American pact on nuclear cooperation. But he could not implement it. Now Modi is trying to activate the agreement.

MMS had wanted Jaishankar to be India's Foreign Secretary, but had to oblige Sonia Gandhi and appoint Sujatha Singh instead. And now, Modi has made him the Foreign Secretary.

What will be Modi's next move?

Sunday, October 05, 2014

Manmohan Singh's autobiography

It is reported that the former prime minister has decided to author a book about himself to set history straight. One wonders whether he has obtained permission from Sonia Gandhi to express his views.

If he wants to write the truth, he cannot but offend Sonia. If he desires, as usual, not to displease her, he cannot be truthful. It will be interesting to see the route he takes.

One hopes that the book will be in the form of a mea culpa. In case he turns economical with truth, his already low credibility will further get eroded.

Updated on 22nd Oct:

Manmohan Singh is reported to have denied any thought about an autobiography. Very surprising that an 'economist' is shy of communicating.

Monday, September 15, 2014

"I, indeed, did my duty"

Asked to comment on Vinod Rai's criticism of his leadership, Manmohan Singh has responded with laconic  " I, indeed, did my duty". If we had thought that the prime minister's duty was to protect the constitution and the nation, we are totally misguided. PM's duty, if we understand the economist genius correctly, is to protect the scamsters from the law.

This is not the first time that Singh gives a sinister twist to meaning of duty. (Please see the post dated 5th October, 2005 on "Manmohan Singh and Bhagavad Gita".) One feels appalled that behind a misleading facade, Singh always had a crooked mind.

Singh will do well to enlighten the nation on all that he had done in pursuance of his duty.



Sunday, September 14, 2014

Ranjit Sinha's hospitality

A country-wide hue and cry has been raised over the CBI Director's visitors. Ranjit Sinha has answered the critics in a step by step methodical way. There was no visitors' log. Even if there was one, what was produced in the Supreme Court was not genuine. Even if it was genuine, he did not meet all of them. Even if he met all of them, he met them only to satisfy himself about the veracity of notings made against them by CBI's lower level politically-naive officials. So, where is the alleged misconduct by the Director?

Sinha wants the name of 'whistle-blower' to be made known. Who is the ungrateful / unreliable renegade who has stooped to the level of disclosing what his / her boss does? This 'namak haram' should be named, shamed and jailed. Nobody has the right to bring down the reputation of the CBI Chief.

How does the Supreme Court even think of entertaining an application against the conduct of the CBI Chief? Has it forgotten Thomas Fuller's famous dictum: "Be you ever so high, the CBI is above you"? The Supreme Court must be charged with contempt of CBI.

Let us not forget the noble role played by Manmohan Singh in ensuring Ranjit Sinha's appointment to head the CBI. He protected the 'Coalition Dharma' by favouring Lalu Prasad's saviour. It is a befitting coincidence that both Singh and Sinha have 'Sin' deeply embedded in their names.

Saturday, August 09, 2014

Daughter on Manmohan Singh

"Strictly Personal" is the biography of Mr. and Mrs. Manmohan Singh written by their daughter, Daman Singh. It is but natural that the book is full of unadulterated filial compliment to the former prime minister. In an interview with The Hindu, the biographer has said,

"Basically, my father started his career as a lecturer in Punjab University. He’s never applied for any job ever since, the offers just came to him. That’s how he went to the UN, to Delhi School of Economics, to the Ministry of Foreign Trade, the Planning Commission, RBI etc etc etc. That’s how he became finance minister. That’s how he became prime minister. So, I suppose his work sort of spoke for itself."

It is not surprising that there is no reference to her father becoming Chairman of University Grants Commission through a subterfuge. As is well known and as vouchsafed by Arun Shourie and others, Manmohan Singh in a way appointed himself to head the UGC. When Chandrasekhar had already become a care-taker prime minister, Singh placed a pre-dated note to him for approving Singh's appointment as the chief of UGC. Obviously Manmohan Singh knows how to protect his personal interests. It became clear later on when he allowed his ministers to run amuck that he cared little for the nation.

Yes, Manmohan Singh is perhaps better than many other politicians. He is however not a saint. 

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Karn and Kumbhkarn

Manmohan Singh is a combination of Mahabharat's Karn and Ramayan's Kumbhkarn. Like Karn, MMS is ever beholden to his well-wisher, Sonia Gandhi. Like Kumbhkarn, MMS slept for half of UPA regime.

But neither epic character was as selfish as Manmohan Singh. In addition, they were communicative.

Saturday, May 17, 2014

What a fall !

“Ten years ago, when I was entrusted with this responsibility, I entered upon it with diligence as my tool, truth as my beacon and a prayer that I might always do the right thing,” Manmohan Singh said in his statement. (This statement alone entitles Singh to a Nobel Prize in Literature as the best of any fiction ever written.)

Ten years later, he leaves the post recognised as the most indiligent prime minister we ever had, and doing the only thing he did right in the last five years, that is retiring from the post. His beacon of truth deserted him when he defended ministers like Raja and ranis like Sonia Gandhi. 

At least now, would Manmohan Singh stand by his professed ideals and inform the nation why he acted the way he did especially in the last five years?

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Manmohan Singh, the master scamster

The secretary in the ministry of Health and Family Welfare refused his minister's (Ghulam Nabi Azad's) suggestion to recommend a scam-tainted person for a particular post under the control of the ministry. Consequently, the secretary was shifted. The scam-tainted person was Sonia Gandhi's choice. (You may wonder why state the obvious?)

P.Chidambaram publicly humiliated one senior civil servant because the latter's English was not Queen's. The civil servant represented his grievance to the prime minister.

An IPS official not endorsed by the CVC was appointed as Additional Director, CBI.

These and many more such instances reflect the decay occurring in governance. In most such instances, the honourable prime minister could have undone the damage or at least expressed his anguish. He did neither. His heart bleeds over disruptions in the parliament. But he is not affected in the least by unending array of scams manifesting under his nose.

Many people wonder how such a sincere and honest person could put up with so many scandals. Such people should reexamine their assumption!

Thursday, February 06, 2014

Prime Minister's perfidy

It is unfortunate that Manmohan Singh has once again proved himself to be sinistrally recalcitrant. The Lokpal Selection Panel consists of five members: the prime minister, leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, a Judge of the Supreme Court and a jurist. While selecting the jurist, the government had proposed a panel of names including K.Parasaran , Fali S.Nariman and P.P.Rao.

The prime minister insisted on appointing P.P.Rao as a jurist. The leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha disagreed and suggested appointment of either Parasaran or Fali Nariman. Selection of either would have ensured unanimity in choice of the fifth member. But Manmohan Singh would have none of it.

Singh's approach has been peevish and political. This is not what we expect from a leader. Apparently, right from the beginning, Singh and his leader (or the leader and therefore Singh) wanted only Rao though other names were suggested more as a formality. Other three members of the panel rubber-stamped Singh's choice.

If post-retirement, Manmohan Singh ruminates over his arbitrary actions as prime minister, he will be overwhelmed by cognitive dissonance. 

Thursday, January 02, 2014

Manmohan Singh's revelation

Though reticent, prime minister Manmohan Singh is a shrewd observer of people. In a rare media conference today (3rd Jan.), he observed without batting an eyelid: "I have ruled myself out as a PM candidate if UPA comes back to power. Rahul Gandhi has outstanding credentials to be the PM candidate."

Rahul Gandhi's credentials, invisible to others, have been noticed by Singh. Is Gandhi such a good actor that he can hide his credentials from all others?

There is only one problem with PM's remark. Does Gandhi have credentials only to be PM candidate? Is he not qualified to be PM? I am sure Soniaji is not impressed with Singh's loyalty.


Sunday, October 27, 2013

Peripatetic prime minister

The Economist points out that Manmohan Singh has spent a tenth of his near-decade as prime minister abroad. He has flown more than 1m km in 72 official visits.(He is not done yet.) "Beleaguered at home by scandal and gloomy prospects for his ruling Congress party, the airport departure lounge is more tempting than ever." It is difficult to get eviscerated in more blunt terms.

As a bonus the magazine adds, "And abroad he is unconstrained by his part boss, Sonia Gandhi." It is widely believed that coal allocations were made at the instance of Sonia Gandhi conveyed through her most trusted secretary, Ahmed Patel. Of course, PMO has denied this inference.

How did the venerable Singh land in this mess? Had he done something in the past that is opportunistically utilised by his leader to blackmail him into falling in line without demur? Future will reveal.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Manish Tewari's strange advice: Part II

The Hindu reports:

"Dr. Singh was ‘satisfied’ that the final decision taken in this regard was ‘entirely appropriate’, and was based ‘on the merits of the case placed before him’. This is the first time Dr. Singh has clearly and unequivocally come out in support of the former coal secretary P.C Parakh, in the wake of the recent controversy where Mr. Parakh, along with Mr. Birla, has been named by the CBI in a fresh FIR."

It is unfortunate that the prime minister has ignored the noble advice of his cabinet colleague, Manish Tewari and gone public on a case which is 'subjudice'. There is one more interesting development. After the prime minister clarified that the final decision was entirely appropriate and was based on the merits of the case placed before him, Salman Khurshid and Manish Tewari have proffered the golden principle that bureaucrats and not the ministers are responsible for the decisions taken. A new kind of democracy on the anvil?

If ministers are not accountable for decisions, what are they accountable for? The twin ministerial luminaries have also clarified as P.Chidambaram had earlier explained in another context that ministers cannot be expected to read the notes which are approved by them. What an exemplary view!

On what authority does Manmohan Singh now claim that the decision was taken based on the merits of the case placed before him? Had he committed the unpardonable sin of reading the note placed to him?
Why should the ministers say that the prime minister cannot be expected to read the note after the latter 'admitted' to and pleaded guilty of reading the file?

In the FIR filed against Parakh and K M Birla, Singh should also have been named. Can the CBI now think of dropping the FIR on the basis of a rare assertion of the "should have been named" Singh?

Murphy's Law states "Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong". GOI's Law says,"Anything that cannot go wrong, will also go wrong". Great going!

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Undermining bureaucracy to save corrupt politicians: Is our prime minister a sociopath?

Following report is from Times of India. The irony cannot be more stark. The Prime Minister who presided over all scams is safe. Those officials who wanted to streamline governance are charged with corruption. It will be interesting if a psychologist would study the sociopathic tendencies of our P.M.

Coalgate FIR: Bureaucracy shocked by action against 'honest' officer











NEW DELHI: The irony couldn't be starker. Booked for corruption in a Coalgate case, former coal secretary PC Parakh had strongly protested to the Prime Minister against political interference in the coal ministry.

Sources familiar with events said Parakh, coal secretary in 2004-05, referring to the intrusive role of then minister of state for coal Dasari Narayana Rao, had explained the morale of officials was adversely affected by Rao's actions.

A concerned PM is understood to have assured Parakh that he would speak to officials to reassure them and dissuaded the senior bureaucrat from putting in his papers.

On Tuesday, as word of the CBI filing a case against Parakh spread, officials were shaking their heads in disbelief. While serving officers would not go on record, former power secretary E A S Sarma told ToI, "It is indeed a sad commentary for an FIR being filed against an upright and honest officer like P C Parakh."

Sarma added that he is waiting for action against PMO for its role in Coalgate. "I made a formal complaint to CVC last year and earlier that PMO's role in Coalgate and other scams should be investigated. I do not find any visible action on that complaint so far," he said.

Sarma said there are senior politicians involved in Coalgate and none has so far been proceeded against. Proceeding against honest officers and letting off dishonest politicians will only erode the credibility of the government.

Furious emails were exchanged as bureaucrats recalled that Parakh had first blown the whistle on a likely scandal in coal block allocations by warning in July 2004 that award of captive coal blocks could result in "windfall profits" for benefitted corporates.

Just like Pararkh, his predecessor in the coal ministry H C Gupta is also facing an investigation. Gupta strongly amplified Parakh's warnings, saying in a meeting held in PMO on April 7, 2006, that there is no legal basis for allocation of coal blocks by a screening committee.

The case of Shyamal Ghosh, a former telecom secretary, is also spoken of among officials as being made a victim of political score settling between the UPA government and BJP. Ghosh has been booked in a case relating to fees being waived off when the late BJP leader Pramod Mahajan was telecom minister.

Officials point to demoralization in the bureaucracy due to alleged witch hunts. "An honest officer under investigation for no fault of his feels diminished. The crooks don't get caught, but the diligent officer feels double the distress," said a bureaucrat.

He said Parakh has been targeted while "others are not being proceeded against. I understand that he was the one who put his foot down on the first-come-first-served method of coal block allocation and expressed himself firmly in favour of a transparent, auction system. He was overruled."

Sarma said there are senior politicians involved in coalgate and none has so far been proceeded against. Proceeding against honest officers and letting off dishonest politicians, corporates and officers will only erode the credibility of the government which has diminished a great deal during the recent times.

Wednesday, October 02, 2013

Manmohan Singh

Sanjeev S.Ahluwalia is a former civil servant and Montek Singh Ahluwalia's brother. He has written the following in his blog. This was written before Rahul Gandhi's histrionic 'nonsense' act.

"We assume that knowledge, learning and professionalism is what makes the difference between an “extractive” policracy and a “developmental” one. This builds on the modern Indian tradition of education being the path to progress and the high ritual status given to learned Brahmins, poets, literatures and artists in ancient India. Dr Radhakrishnan (1962-67), Dr Zakir Hussain (1967-69), Dr Abdul Kalam (2002-07) and Pandit Nehru (1947-1964) did not disappoint in their actions as President/Prime Minister by remaining true to their intellectual integrity.
In 2004 when Dr Manmohan Singh was selected by Mrs Gandhi to became PM, there was relief that after a hiatus of two decades, India would again be led by an “intellectual” far above the hurly burly of election politics, with no personal stake and no motive, except to “wipe the tears from the eyes of the poorest Indian” (the Mahatma). We exulted when Dr. Singh showed his mettle in initiating change in our energy policy, continuing the BJP approach in external relations of abandoning the deadweight of polarizing ideology, unless it served national interest and seemingly putting Indian on the track of fast growth with social inclusion. In 1984 he was an accidental choice as PM, out of the several other “old” faces around, who were considered politically innocuous enough, to keep the seat warm for Rahul.
In 2009 we voted for Dr Singh, based on his record of the past five years but also based on our belief,  that more and better was to come. He and the Congress with him, won and the deluge began. Like the collapse of the mountains above Kedarnath, the lofty edifice built up by reputation and public expectations cracked and collapsed under the weight of timidity, poor political instincts but most importantly self-betrayal.
Dr Singh betrayed himself time and again as he turned a Nelson’s eye to massive corruption, allowed decision making to be subverted by unconscionably partisan politics and sloth. He defined the integrity of the highest executive position in India as a narrowly construed “personal” integrity and in doing so reverted to his essentially “babu” roots of keeping “his desk clean”. Even this is questioned in the 2G scam and Coalgate, though most would put down the seeming links to him, to a secretariat, outside of his control. He betrayed his profession, since economics played, at best a marginal role, in the working of his cabinet. He betrayed his earlier characterization of himself as a Sher (Singh) and appeared to meekly toe the backward looking, ineffective and contradictory party line. In acting thus, he debased the high office he holds. Who holds the Nuclear “button” today is really the question?  and does the World believe that Dr. Singh would be allowed to press it should the situation warrant?
Could he have acted differently? Was he constrained by the limitations imposed on “outsiders” joining the “policracy” laterally, as Russi Mody was in Air India or Sudhir Muljee in the State Trading Corporation? The analogy itself nails the absurdity of the comparison. When the going gets tough, the tough get going….one way or another.  
Here is some gratuitous advice to Dr. Singh. It is not too late to resign. Rahul is ripe to take over and we would all welcome his coming out of the shadows. More importantly, when you became PM you became “our” PM, not the Congress Party’s representative. You are, hopefully, not just any other policrat. Please preserve our faith in the belief that professionals and intellectuals are actually “high minded” enough to work against their own self-interest. Are you scared that once the “immunity” of high office is lifted the opposition will go after you hammer and tongs and even your own party will “sacrifice” you, just as they failed to support you, when you fought your first and only election in South Delhi in 2004? Surely, as the PM, you have a “black book” in the “cloud” which will act as “insurance”? Please do it now, so that all of us, who believe that education and erudition results in intellectual integrity and purposefulness, can continue to dream.
T.N. Seshan (Chief Election Commissioner 1990-1996), another babu, turned upon the political machine which created him, once he was given a high constitutional position. But he served us Indians well by working against election malpractices. Most recently, Raghuram Rajan (RBI Governor) has done exactly the same by ignoring the noise of corporate and government “likes” and remaining true to his intellectual integrity and commitment to the poor, by targeting inflation, rather than pandering to the optics of growth orientation…just as his babu predecessor (Subba Rao) had done. This is a time honored tradition amongst babus. We sup with anyone who parties in the evening, but come the morning, we do the “right” thing, no matter what the consequences. There are thousands of babus who do this for 35 long years of their working lives and are none the worse for it. Please shed your intellectual robes and become the babu you have been."